A staking plan is a rule for deciding how much to bet on each selection.
Definition
A staking plan is a rule for deciding how much to bet on each selection. Level staking bets the same amount every time; percentage staking bets a fixed fraction of the current bankroll; proportional or confidence staking varies the stake with the perceived edge (Kelly is the formal version); and progressive plans (Martingale, Fibonacci, Labouchere) increase stakes after losses to try to recover them.
Level and percentage staking are the standard disciplined choices; progressive plans are widely misunderstood.
No staking plan changes the expected value of the underlying bets. Progressive negative-progression plans in particular do not overcome the house edge or bookmaker margin — they trade many small wins for occasional catastrophic losses when a losing run exceeds the bankroll or the table limit, and over time they lose at the same rate as any other plan, just with a worse risk profile.
In context
For affiliates, staking-plan content is a place where a lot of misleading material exists, so accurate coverage has real value. Content should present level and percentage staking as the sensible disciplined options, explain confidence or Kelly-based staking as conditional on a genuine edge, and be unambiguous that progressive negative-progression systems — Martingale and its relatives — do not work: they cannot overcome a negative expected value, they produce a smooth run of small wins followed by a rare wipeout, and the wipeout is a mathematical certainty over enough play given finite bankrolls and table limits.
The framing should treat betting systems and staking plans as separate from finding value: a staking plan governs how much to bet, not whether the bet has an edge, and no amount of staking cleverness turns a negative-EV activity positive. Content should not present any system as a way to beat casino games or the bookmaker, should carry responsible-gambling messaging, and should note that chasing losses with escalating stakes — which is what negative-progression plans institutionalise — is a recognised marker of gambling harm.
For affiliate-facing content, the framing is that level and percentage staking are the disciplined defaults, that Kelly-style staking needs a real edge, and that progressive loss-chasing systems are ineffective and risky and should be debunked rather than described neutrally.
Worked example
An affiliate's staking guide recommends level or percentage staking, explains Kelly-style staking needs a validated edge, and debunks Martingale with a worked example showing how a modest losing run hits the table limit and produces a catastrophic loss. It states no plan changes expected value, flags escalating-stake loss-chasing as a harm marker, and carries responsible-gambling messaging.
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Browse the full iGaming & affiliate glossary — hundreds of EN/RU terms with examples.
← Back to glossary