Trust ranking · Updated 2026

Crypto casino trust ranking

Trust scores for 1642 casinos that accept cryptocurrency — licences, reputation, infrastructure, sanctions. · showing the top 100

100

Brands ranked

Grade A + B

Grade C

0 brands selected for comparison

Compare now →

#	Brand	Score	Grade	Trend	Licenses
1	bwin	70	B · Reliable	↓ -2	8
2	Betfair	68	B · Reliable	↓ -1	16
3	NetBet	68	B · Reliable	↓ -10	4
4	Betway	64	B · Reliable	↓ -14	5
5	Betting	63	B · Reliable	↓ -6	24
6	FanDuel	63	B · Reliable	↓ -9	4
7	LeoVegas	62	B · Reliable	↓ -10	3
8	PokerStars	61	B · Reliable	↓ -9	4
9	TonyBet	59	C · Moderate	↓ -9	3
10	William Hill	56	C · Moderate	↓ -5	5
11	iGaming	54	C · Moderate	↓ -11	6
12	Casumo	53	C · Moderate	↓ -7	4
13	10bet	52	C · Moderate	↓ -5	2
14	BetMGM	52	C · Moderate	↓ -3	3
15	BoyleSports	52	C · Moderate	↓ -6	4
16	Rizk	52	C · Moderate	↓ -8	3
17	Duelbits	51	C · Moderate	↑ +7	1
18	Mr Vegas	51	C · Moderate	↑ +11	3
19	Unibet	51	C · Moderate	↓ -7	3
20	BetVictor	50	C · Moderate	↓ -9	5
21	Golden Nugget	50	C · Moderate	↓ -6	2
22	JackpotCity	50	C · Moderate	↓ -9	1
23	Coolbet	49	C · Moderate	↑ +9	2
24	7Bit Casino	48	C · Moderate	↓ -3	1
25	Betsson	48	C · Moderate	↓ -9	4
26	BitStarz	48	C · Moderate	↓ -5	1
27	Lucky Days	48	C · Moderate	↓ -7	1
28	GGPoker	47	C · Moderate	↓ -12	3
29	Cloudbet	46	C · Moderate	↓ -1	1
30	mBit Casino	46	C · Moderate	↓ -2	1
31	Spin Casino	46	C · Moderate	↓ -8	1
32	Videoslots	46	C · Moderate	↓ -29	6
33	20Bet	45	C · Moderate	↓ -7	1
34	CBet	45	C · Moderate	↑ +4	0
35	ComeOn	45	C · Moderate	↓ -11	2
36	Fairspin	45	C · Moderate	→ 0	1
37	Favbet	45	C · Moderate	↓ -9	2
38	Lemon	45	C · Moderate	↓ -2	1
39	Rollbit	45	C · Moderate	↑ +4	0
40	theScore Bet	45	C · Moderate	↓ -6	2
41	18Bet	44	C · Moderate	↑ +4	2
42	4raBet	44	C · Moderate	↓ -1	1
43	BetPlay	44	C · Moderate	↓ -5	2
44	Bison	44	C · Moderate	↑ +1	1
45	Fun88	44	C · Moderate	↑ +2	1
46	PlayStar	44	C · Moderate	↓ -10	1
47	Shuffle	44	C · Moderate	↓ -6	2
48	Stake	44	C · Moderate	↑ +3	2
49	Bitsler	43	C · Moderate	↓ -5	1
50	Hard Rock Bet	43	C · Moderate	↓ -10	1
51	Vulkan Vegas	43	C · Moderate	↓ -8	0
52	Adrenaline	42	C · Moderate	↓ -7	0
53	BetFury	42	C · Moderate	↓ -1	1
54	Bons Casino	42	C · Moderate	↓ -2	1
55	Casinobet	42	C · Moderate	↓ -2	1
56	Circus	42	C · Moderate	↓ -4	3
57	Energy Casino	42	C · Moderate	→ 0	1
58	Fun Casino	42	C · Moderate	↑ +15	2
59	ICE Casino	42	C · Moderate	↓ -7	0
60	Jackpotter	42	C · Moderate	↓ -2	0
61	LiveScore Bet	42	C · Moderate	↓ -9	1
62	Mozzartbet	42	C · Moderate	↓ -10	2
63	Spinarium	42	C · Moderate	↓ -3	0
64	12bet	41	C · Moderate	↓ -4	0
65	BacanaPlay Casino DE	41	C · Moderate	—	3
66	BetRebels	41	C · Moderate	→ 0	1
67	Betreels	41	C · Moderate	↑ +3	1
68	Betroom24	41	C · Moderate	↓ -3	0
69	Betzest	41	C · Moderate	↓ -2	0
70	EfBet	41	C · Moderate	↓ -10	1
71	Estrela Bet	41	C · Moderate	↓ -3	1
72	GDFplay	41	C · Moderate	↓ -6	0
73	Osom	41	C · Moderate	↑ +1	0
74	PlayAmo	41	C · Moderate	↓ -7	0
75	Rain	41	C · Moderate	↓ -3	0
76	Sportingbet	41	C · Moderate	↓ -9	3
77	StakePrix	41	C · Moderate	→ 0	1
78	Verde Casino	41	C · Moderate	→ 0	1
79	1xBet	40	C · Moderate	↓ -8	2
80	Bet90	40	C · Moderate	↓ -8	1
81	Crashino	40	C · Moderate	↓ -4	0
82	Diamond 7 Casino	40	C · Moderate	—	3
83	Jackpot	40	C · Moderate	↓ -4	3
84	Marathonbet	40	C · Moderate	↓ -12	1
85	Stakes Casino	40	C · Moderate	—	0
86	Thunderpick	40	C · Moderate	↓ -4	1
87	Wildz	40	C · Moderate	→ 0	1
88	Wolf.Bet	40	C · Moderate	—	2
89	WSM	40	C · Moderate	→ 0	0
90	X3000	40	C · Moderate	↑ +2	1
91	Zula	40	C · Moderate	—	0
92	Airbet	39	D · Caution	↓ -2	0
93	Betiton	39	D · Caution	↑ +3	2
94	Big Betty	39	D · Caution	↓ -3	0
95	Casinobud	39	D · Caution	—	2
96	Clobet	39	D · Caution	↓ -6	2
97	Gamblezen	39	D · Caution	↑ +4	1
98	Hollywoodbets	39	D · Caution	↓ -13	2
99	KatsuBet	39	D · Caution	↓ -2	1
100	PartyCasino	39	D · Caution	↓ -13	2

methodology

How trust scores work

The trust leaderboard is an independent, methodology-driven ranking. These answers explain how scores are built, what the grades mean and why the inputs cannot be gamed.

What is the iGaming trust score?

The trust score is a composite metric from 0 to 100 that evaluates iGaming brands across five dimensions: regulatory standing (licences held and their tier), reputation (Trustpilot ratings, review volume, complaint history), infrastructure (domain age, SSL health, DNS stability), transparency (T&C clarity, withdrawal policy visibility, responsible gambling page presence) and scale (number of markets, brands, domains operated). The score is calculated from publicly verifiable data, not from user submissions or paid placements.

Who is this leaderboard for?

The trust ranking is built for B2B decision-makers: affiliate managers evaluating which brands to promote, payment processors assessing partner risk, investors tracking operator reliability, compliance teams comparing regulatory footprints and players researching operator trustworthiness before depositing. It is a due-diligence tool, not a consumer recommendation.

How are grades A through F assigned?

Grades are absolute score thresholds, not percentile rankings. Grade A (Trusted, 80-100) is reserved for brands with the strongest regulatory, reputation and infrastructure profiles. Grade B (Reliable, 60-79) covers established operators with solid track records. Grade C (Moderate, 40-59) marks brands with acceptable but not exemplary trust signals. Grade D (Caution, 20-39) flags brands with limited transparency or weak infrastructure. Grade F (Risky, below 20) indicates significant trust deficits - missing licences, poor reputation scores or infrastructure problems.

Can a brand improve its trust score?

Yes. Trust scores are recalculated monthly. A brand that obtains a new licence, improves its Trustpilot rating, extends its domain SSL certificate or publishes clearer terms will see its score rise in the next cycle. Conversely, a lost licence, a surge in complaints or an expired SSL certificate will lower the score. The ranking tracks current trust signals, not historical reputation.

Why is this ranking independent?

The dataset is compiled from publicly verifiable sources: regulator registers (UKGC, MGA, Spelinspektionen, DGOJ, GGL and others), Trustpilot public reviews, domain WHOIS records, SSL certificate transparency logs and operator-published policy pages. No brand pays for inclusion, placement or score adjustment. The methodology is published openly so any result can be reproduced from the same public sources.

How often is the trust leaderboard updated?

The underlying metrics are recalculated monthly. Trustpilot ratings refresh continuously, SSL certificate status is checked daily, domain WHOIS data updates on change and licence status is verified against regulator registers weekly. The "Updated" marker in the hero reflects the current calculation year; the exact refresh date for each brand is available on its individual brand page.

What makes a brand grade A or F?

Grade A brands typically hold multiple tier-1 licences (UKGC, MGA, GGL), have Trustpilot ratings above 4.0 with thousands of reviews, own domains older than 10 years with valid SSL certificates and publish clear T&C, withdrawal and responsible gambling pages. Grade F brands often lack tier-1 licences, have poor or missing Trustpilot presence, use recently registered domains, have SSL or DNS issues and may not publish clear policy pages.

Can a brand buy a better grade?

No. The trust score is not a paid product. Brands cannot purchase a higher grade, a better position on the leaderboard or removal from the list. The five input dimensions are derived from operational data that brands cannot manipulate retroactively: licences are filed with regulators, Trustpilot reviews are submitted by users, domain registrations are timestamped and SSL certificates are logged in public transparency logs.