Dual licensing refers to a regulatory regime that issues separate licences for different roles in the gambling supply chain: a business-to-consumer (B2C) licence for the operator that takes bets from and pays winnings to players, and a business-to-business (B2B) licence for suppliers that provide software, games, platforms, aggregation or other services to licensed operators.
Definition
Dual licensing refers to a regulatory regime that issues separate licences for different roles in the gambling supply chain: a business-to-consumer (B2C) licence for the operator that takes bets from and pays winnings to players, and a business-to-business (B2B) licence for suppliers that provide software, games, platforms, aggregation or other services to licensed operators. A game studio or platform provider needs the B2B licence to supply the market; the casino brand needs the B2C licence to serve players.
Some regimes add further category licences (for example separate ones for betting, casino, or lottery).
The model exists so the regulator can hold each part of the chain accountable for what it controls — game fairness and technical standards at the B2B level, player-facing conduct and consumer protection at the B2C level — rather than treating the operator as solely responsible for everything upstream.
In context
For affiliates, dual licensing is useful context for assessing operator legitimacy and for understanding the ecosystem behind a brand. In a dual-licensing market, a properly licensed casino runs on B2B-licensed platform and game suppliers, and a review can note that the operator holds the local B2C licence and that its games come from B2B-licensed studios — a stronger legitimacy signal than a single offshore licence.
It also explains why the same game can be certified and available in one market but not another: the studio needs the local B2B licence for that market, not just any licence.
Dual licensing also clarifies where responsibility sits when something goes wrong. A game-fairness or RNG question is a B2B-supplier and technical-standards matter; a withheld-withdrawal, misleading-bonus or account-closure dispute is a B2C-operator matter with the local ADR route.
For affiliate content, the practical value is being able to describe an operator's regulatory standing accurately — which licences it and its key suppliers hold, in which market — rather than treating "licensed" as a single binary. In white-label arrangements, dual licensing also determines whether the licence sits with the platform provider or the brand, which affects who is accountable to the regulator and to players.
Worked example
An affiliate's operator review in a dual-licensing market states the brand holds the local B2C licence, its platform provider holds the B2B platform licence, and its game studios are B2B-licensed for that market. It explains that fairness questions sit with the licensed suppliers and player-conduct disputes with the B2C operator via the local ADR body.
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Browse the full iGaming & affiliate glossary — hundreds of EN/RU terms with examples.
← Back to glossary