Round recall, or game history, is the record every licensed gambling platform keeps of each individual game round or bet — the stake, the time, the outcome, the sequence of events (cards dealt, reels stopped, feature triggered), and the resulting balance change — retained for a required period and retrievable by the player, the operator's support and the regulator.
Definition
Round recall, or game history, is the record every licensed gambling platform keeps of each individual game round or bet — the stake, the time, the outcome, the sequence of events (cards dealt, reels stopped, feature triggered), and the resulting balance change — retained for a required period and retrievable by the player, the operator's support and the regulator. It is a licensing requirement in regulated markets and the authoritative source for resolving any dispute about what happened in a round.
When a player claims a win was not paid, a round did not complete, or a bonus was lost incorrectly, the round recall is what the operator, an ADR body or a regulator examines. A robust, complete and player-accessible game history is a core integrity control; gaps or inconsistencies in it are a serious problem for an operator.
In context
For affiliates, round recall is a genuinely useful thing to explain in complaints-oriented content and to assess in operator reviews. Players with a dispute often do not know that a detailed game history exists and is the evidence that settles it.
Content can tell a reader how to find their game history, what it shows, and that raising a dispute with the operator (then, if needed, with the named ADR body) using specific round IDs and timestamps from that history is the effective route — far better than a vague complaint.
As an operator-quality factor, the accessibility and completeness of game history is worth checking: a good operator makes a full, clear history available to the player, not just a summary, and can produce round-level detail quickly when a dispute is raised. This ties into the payout-speed and mystery-shopper testing an affiliate does.
Content should also explain that game history is why "the casino can just say I didn't win" is not how regulated disputes work — the round is recorded and can be examined independently. Age-gating and responsible-gambling messaging apply, and game-history access can also be framed as a tool for a player to review their own spending.
For affiliate-facing content, the framing is that round recall is the authoritative, regulator-required record of every game round, that it is the evidence for resolving disputes and a legitimate operator-quality factor, and that content should show players how to access and use it rather than leaving them to complain without it.
Worked example
An affiliate's complaints guide explains that every round is recorded in game history, shows the reader how to find it, and advises raising any dispute with the operator using specific round IDs and timestamps, then escalating to the named ADR body if unresolved. Its operator reviews check how accessible and complete each brand's game history is.
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Browse the full iGaming & affiliate glossary — hundreds of EN/RU terms with examples.
← Back to glossary